350 Bay Area was part of the successful coalition (picture above is of thousands of petitions being delivered to the CPUC) that won the preservation of net metering in California back in early 2016. We continue to watch for and fight against any weakening of this plan.  Net metering is very important to the success of distributed generation, like rooftop solar. Through the work of our Clean Energy Campaign, 350 Bay Area was one of a handful of grassroots groups to fully engage as an official party to the CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) proceeding, as well as organizing grassroots activism in support of rooftop solar.  The basic idea of Net Metering is pretty straightforward.

If you put solar panels on your roof and enroll in a net metering program as most do, you will first use the energy it creates for your own energy in your house during the day when the sun is out.  Any excess you create beyond that is put back in the grid as a credit and a meter runs backward keeping track of how much that is. When you use electricity at night the credit you have accumulated keeps you from having to pay for all of that.  If you create excess beyond that, your electric utility then credits you back for that at some point.  Different formulas exist in different states.  California’s policy is explained HERE if you scroll down.  It was extended until 2019 in that effort referred to in the above paragraph, but it is still in effect as of May 2020. A good article on the effort can be read by clicking HERE

There are other issues besides Net Metering that we monitor and engage with the CPUC on.  There are efforts to “regulate” Community Choice Energy (CCE) programs and a hot issue is the PCIA (stands for Power Change Indifference Adjustment) charge on the bills of those who get their energy generation from a community choice program they are enrolled in as most everyone is now in the Bay Area.  Few who see it are “indifferent” about it and it initially was going to be temporary.  Now it is moving higher and plans are to keep it indefinitely – something which is controversial.  It is an “exit” fee because the customer in a CCE program has “left” a long-term contract the investor-owned utility made to generate the energy for them, assuming they would always be using that generated energy. 350 Bay Area is a legal party to this rule-making, though not active right now as it became too complicated.  One earlier comment to the CPUC can be found HERE – An explanation that is pretty good about what is happening with this is HERE  

We have been engaging the CPUC on the issue of the “cost” of various types of energy.  Frequently the “true” cost is passed over lightly to focus more on the money ratepayors have to pay for the transmission and generation of the energy without looking at the societal cost involved in mitigating the health problems and environmental damage and, yes, even the climate change or global warming attributes associated with each energy type.  This is a key issue that is just now being focused on at the CPUC in an on-going proceeding we are involved in as a “party”.  The proceeding which has to do with creating a consistent regulatory framework for looking at integrated distributed energy resources has been going on since 2014 and  had a workshop on societal cost awhile ago that we participated in. Learn what happened at that workshop HERE. We have been engaged in a variety of workshops and proposed decisions on various aspects of this issue which very much relates to how local and clean our energy is, and since community choice energy programs are set up with the goal usually of building or buying local, more efficient, renewable energy (and now battery storage to make it useful 24 hours/day) we are in effect supporting and protecting your community choice energy program.

We also just became invovled as a Party in the rule-making on microgrids based on a 2018 bill that Sen Stern wrote with the idea of trying to facilitate the “commercialization of microgrids”. This is a very contentious issue especially for local communities and the investor-owned utilities (IOU’s). In the first track of the rule-making, decided in June, the CPUC allowed IOU’s to use polluting, diesel generators to back up their equipment for the 2020 fire season over the protests of most all environmental groups. We became a party in July to join with other groups to stop this trend and establish clear quidelines to open up the development of more renewable energy based and backed-up microgrids, particularly to others besides just the IOU’s. Our initial Comment in Track 2 of the rule-making is HERE

Please join us for all of these policy efforts. If interested, please email Ken Jones at Ken@350BayArea.org